Ambivalence is a state of contradictory desire:
to love and hate the same thing, same person, to feel a sense of belonging and
at the same time alienation, to at once agree yet also to disagree. Ambivalence
mires us in indecision, drains energy from our convictions and causes emotional
stress.
It
is a two-headed deer joined at the mid section. One pair of forelegs is planted
firmly on the ground as if attempting to lift itself on all fours. The other
pair of legs is splayed in the air, falling, the head turned toward its own
back as if to find the cause of its physical incapacitation. As one, this
strange animal describes a three-dimensional arabesque. The twisting torso and
necks define an elegant s-shape. The contrapuntal action and direction of the
legs give it its expressive tension. It is a sculpture that simultaneously
rises in space while it sinks back to earth. Janus faced, it looks forward and
backward. One can even go as far as to see the first attempt of a new born fawn
to stand, while its other half has been felled by a bullet. (Pushmi-Pulyu, 1996.)
Over
the years Mary Catherine Newcomb has used bodies both human and animal as
symbols of consciousness and as vehicles to express universal desires and
fears. The body, the artist insists, is located at the intellect's base, as the
core and character beneath all knowledge. The body is a partner in a dialogue
with the mind, providing a wealth of sensory information to the brain and
providing abstract thought with an emotional and physical context.
Newcomb's
use of animals has been a consistent refrain throughout her career and may be
likened to the animals of aboriginal and classical myths. Rabbits, as carriers
and symbols of occult knowledge, frequently occur in her papier mâché and cast concrete of the nineteen-eighties. Mice,
snakes, a hyena, a fish, a sheep, and an alligator make appearances in
Newcomb's narrative works as symbols of a knowledge that resides in the body.
With
this two-headed creature, the artist has fashioned an image that has more in
common with the plastic language of classical antiquity and surrealism than the
ironic references of postmodern art making. A human figure joined at the waist
to the body of a horse was the classical image of the satyr – a symbol of lust.
The twisting serpentine form of the deer recalls the Ouroborous – the snake
eating its tail – an ancient symbol of time. This pathetic struggle suggests
the serpent-entangled figures of the second-century B.C. E. Laocoon, and the
hunted deer as a metaphor of human fate can be traced to the myth of Diana and
Acteon.
Newcomb
has given physical embodiment to the inner turmoil of ambivalence. Torn between
our aspirations and our duties, our need for individuation and our group
identity, we are, as the artist suggests, of two minds.
Gordon
Hatt, 1995
No comments:
Post a Comment